Thursday, December 16, 2004

Hanan Ashrawi: a true 'Palestinian'Arab

Lying sack of excrement, in other words.
She gets two pages of interview's worth over at the JeruzalemPost. Waste of good time and space, because this supremely deceitful member of the Jewkillers' elite does nothing but lie and twist, with a polite face.
As I said, the interview is 2 pages long, and there's no real need to read any of it, I did the dirty job for you. Here's the jist of it:
Jerusalem Post: How do you explain the disturbing children's shows that encourage violence and martyrdom that Palestinian television airs?

Ashrawi: "The violence is not manufactured by the Palestinians. The occupation is violent. Palestinian children don't have to learn about violence from textbooks or TV. All they have to do is watch the news. All they have to do is live in an area that is bombed or shelled or where their parents are arrested or beaten up.

"Studies show that more than 80% of Palestinian children are in constant trauma. Most Palestinian children have had relatives killed and have themselves been subjected to violence. So, the reality they live in is inherently abnormal, and therefore, to say that they are being bombarded with [messages of incitement and violence], no, it seems to me that it is the occupation at fault.

"Furthermore, they are robbed of their traditional source of security and comfort, their families, since their parents themselves are vulnerable and cannot protect their children. There are all sorts of problems that these poor children have to contend with. I've always called for less violence on all television because reality is violent enough."
Ashrawi forgets to mention the fact that all the violence is due to the Intifada. Arabs started it. Stop the violence, and they can live in peace.
Had they accepted the Barak offer of a state in 2000, they'd be called Palestinians for real by now. But the scum chose war. And now the defenders are to blame for the war trauma of the Arab children.

And trust me: Ashrawi would not have it any other way. She will gladly sacrifice 'her' children as a political tool, as bargaining chips. It is the 'Palestinian'way.

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

Want to know what the 'Palestinians' want?

Peace? A state of their own? To coexist with their neighbours?

All of the above, AFTER Israel is gone. In IsraelNationalNews, Fatah co-founder Farouk Kadumi reiterates the ultimate goal:
When the interviewer asked Kadumi, “What is the future of Palestine?” the PLO leader answered: “At this stage there will be two states. Many years from now there will be only one.”

Asked why he has not softened his stance against Israel’s existence, Kadumi replied, "Our enemy always says, 'This is Judea and Samaria' ... They haven't changed their discourse. If they change theirs, we will change ours, and if not, we will keep saying that armed resistance is the way to Palestine."

He expressed confidence in the Arabs' ultimate victory, saying, “[There are] 300 million Arabs, while Israel has only the sea behind it."
This is not news. But it seems many people insist on ignoring or forgetting this.

Of course it's all about poverty and oppression

It's not like the genocidal maniacs teach their children to hate from the moment they can walk, now is it?

Dutch secretary thinks making 'Submission' was 'unwise'

Dutch daily Algemeen Dagblad (Dutch) reports that secretary of Economic affairs Brinkhorst compairs making the movie 'Submission' to lighting a cigaret in an ammunitions dump.
'Submission' is a movie that deal with abuse of women under Islam. It was made by Theo van Gogh and Ayaan Hirsi-Ali. Van Gogh was shot and nearly decapitated by a Dutch-born Muslim, and Hirsi-Ali had been living in hiding even before that because of her position on Islam in general.

And now this secretary (who is indeed one of the worst prats Holland has ever seen, and we've seen few) feels this is essentially a natural state to be in. He compares making a movie that deals with a very real and serious social issue (misogeny under Islam) to repeatedly calling your neighbour's wife a dirty whore. Seriously. By which he means: What do you expect when you say something someone else doesn't like hearing?

I guess in a way Brinkhorst is correct in his first analogy: Clearly, saying something that offends Muslims is dangerous. Brinkhort's conclusion is about as cowardly and stupid as possible: Don't offend, and you'll be alright.

And I guess Brinkhorst would not be surprised or inconvenienced if he got shot and then had his his head sawed off. After all, what did he expect after saying something so offensive?

Monday, December 13, 2004

Truth hurts Muslims

People say the truth hurts. I disagree with that. The truth rarely hurts.

It hurts however in the case of Mohammed, prophet of Islam. Judged by modern standards, there's no denying Mohammed was a paedophile. In the UK, Muslims are at the forefront of a fight to make it illegal to say so, but Charles Moore, former editor of the Daily Telegraph is adamant:
Charles Moore, former editor of The Daily Telegraph, provoked a storm of criticism from British Muslims yesterday for an article in which he championed the right to call the Prophet Mohamed a paedophile.

Mr Moore, who opposes new legislation banning incitement to religious hatred, chose the sensitive issue of the Prophet's marriage to a nine-year-old to illustrate his case. "It seems to me that people are perfectly entitled - rude and mistaken as they may be - to say that Mohamed was a paedophile
And it's not like the sick bastard was 16 when he 'married'her: He was at least 53 years old. What's more, he didn't MARRY her when she was 9, he did so when she was 6. HE CONSUMMATED THE MARRIAGE WHEN SHE WAS 9.

Like I said, judged by modern standards. I don't even want to know what standards the Arabs had in the 7th century AD, if they chose to elevate to prophethood a pervert like Muhammed.

Sunday, December 12, 2004

And dogs they are...

Cox & Forkum uses one picture instead of thousands of words:
And mad dogs should be shot.

'Palestinians' change colors once more

Treacherous even for an Arab, Holocaust denier 'Palestinian' chairman Abu Mazen (AKA Mahmoud Abbas, but who can keep track?) has officially apologized to the Kuwaiti despots for supporting Saddam Hussein when he invaded Kuwait. The 'Palestinians' were the only ones to do so, but now that Saddam is gone as their prime financial backer, they have no problem kissing Kuwaiti ass. And the Kuwaiti's, being Arabs themselves, are not at all surprised and don't mind their asses kissed.
Kuwait severed ties with PLO as a result of the Gulf War fall-out and cut its financial backing.

After Saddam Hussein was driven out, the emirate expelled some 400,000 Palestinians, although a few thousand stayed or have since returned.

Mr Abbas said he would be asking the Kuwaiti leadership for financial backing on behalf of the PLO.

"Of course we will present our special needs in front of them [Kuwaitis] and leave it to their consideration," he said, quoted by Reuters.
Miserable terrorists and Jewhaters. Back Saddam in a war of agression and conquest. A bad gamble, and as always they lose. But no matter, because they have no shame. Turn like a leaf on a tree, debase yourself, and beg the people you would previously condemn for a life under the heel of Saddam for money,to kill more Jews. As simple as that.

Isn't it handy to have no pride, no honour?